MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131635173 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18778729

Machine Learning Models for Climate Prediction and Adaptation in Gabon

2003· article· en· W7131635173 on OpenAlexaff
Ngaue Ngondio, Mbangala Mbae, Ebo Oyono, Chomba Nguema

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeLeverage (statistics)Random forestPredictive modellingGradient boostingBoosting (machine learning)Ensemble learningAdaptation (eye)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change poses significant challenges to Gabon's agricultural productivity and resource management, necessitating advanced predictive models for sustainable adaptation strategies. A hybrid ensemble ML approach combining Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Machines was employed. Data were sourced from weather stations across Gabon, ensuring spatial coverage and temporal resolution for model training and validation. The models achieved an average prediction accuracy of 78% with a standard deviation of ±5%, indicating robust performance within the regional climate context. The machine learning models demonstrate promising potential for predicting key climatic variables such as rainfall and temperature, which are critical for agricultural planning in Gabon's varied landscapes. Stakeholders should leverage these ML models to develop adaptive strategies that mitigate risks associated with climate variability. Policy recommendations include integrating predictive insights into national climate change adaptation plans. Model estimation used $\hat{\theta}=argmin_{\theta}\sum_i\ell(y_i,f_\theta(x_i))+\lambda\lVert\theta\rVert_2^2$, with performance evaluated using out-of-sample error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207