MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131638159 · doi:10.17161/tip.vi.25184

Part V, Hemichordata, 2nd Revision, Complete Volume

2023· article· en· W7131638159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTreatise on Invertebrate Paleontology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEngineering and Material Science Research
Canadian institutionsGDG EnvironnementUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismVulnerability (computing)Presentation (obstetrics)Black womenSelection (genetic algorithm)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Identifying the relationship between institutional racism and obstetric violence in black women. Methodology: This is an integrative literature review that followed six steps indicated for its implementation: topic selection and elaboration of the guiding question; literature search; data collect; analysis of included studies; discussion of the result and presentation of the integrative review, the research related results were gathered in a systematic and orderly manner. Results: Pointed to the existence of a greater vulnerability of black women in obstetric care, as they are more susceptible to suffering obstetric violence as a result of the institutional racism installed in society, which is a consequence of the country's slavery history, which remnants to this day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it