MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms, 5-httlpr variants, and their association with major depressive disorder susceptibility

2025· article· W7131796570 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Mitchell, David Chen, Jennifer Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerotonin transporterMajor depressive disorderGenotypingAntidepressantDepression (economics)AlleleGenotypePolymorphism (computer science)Reuptake inhibitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetic variation in the serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4 has been implicated in major depressive disorder susceptibility and antidepressant treatment response. This research examined the association between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism variants and depression phenotypes in a Canadian cohort. Participants (n=798) were recruited from the Toronto Institute for Mental Health Research between April 2023 and October 2024, comprising individuals meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (n=386) and age-matched healthy controls (n=412). Genotyping for the 5-HTTLPR insertion/deletion polymorphism was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification and gel electrophoresis. Depression severity was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Treatment response was evaluated in a subset of patients (n=218) receiving selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor monotherapy. Results demonstrated significant association between the short (S) allele and major depressive disorder diagnosis (OR=2.08, 95% CI: 1.62-2.67, p

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Biochemistry ResearchSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207