MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Disease Detection Using Deep Learning

2025· article· W7131815963 on OpenAlexaff
Om Sahu, Arya Singh, Deo Prakash

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningConvolutional neural networkInferenceSoftware deploymentArtificial neural networkBridging (networking)Health careHealthcare systemKidney disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early and correct diagnosis is still a major difficulty in today’s healthcare system, especially in impoverished and distant areas with limited access to professional medical staff and testing facilities. worse treatment expenses and worse death rates are frequently the results of delayed diagnosis. Using cutting-edge Deep Learning (DL) and Machine Learning (ML) architectures combined with edge computing for real-time deployment, this study provides a reliable, scalable, and multi-modal disease detection system. The suggested system can identify more than 50 diseases by using ensemble learning techniques for structured clinical data and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for image-based diagnosis. These include infectious diseases like sickle cell anemia and malaria, complicated pathologies like brain tumors and different types of cancer, and chronic problems like diabetes and cardiovascular disorders.Offline inference in low-bandwidth contexts is made possible by the system’s deployment optimization on the NVIDIA Jetson Nano. With diabetes prediction at 94%, obesity classification at 99%, brain tumor detection at 96%, and chronic kidney disease prediction at 99%, experimental results show remarkable predictive accuracy across different models. This approach offers an affordable answer to global health issues by bridging the gap between cutting-edge AI capabilities and easily accessible healthcare infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207