MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131828823 · doi:10.3917/psca.074.0034

Kahnawake : atypies ou utopie

2017· article· fr· W7131828823 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Dominique Leccia

Bibliographic record

VenuePsy Cause · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoison controlIdentity (music)Happening

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

le suicide est devenu le baromètre de l ’état de santé mentale des communautés amérindiennes. Au Québec un taux de suicide 3 à 4 fois supérieur à la moyenne. A Kahnawake, une communauté à 15 km du centre ville de Montréal, le suicide est un souci permanent, mais Son triste décompte est dans la moyenne canadienne. Au travers de mon expérience professionnelle, nous allons apprendre à mieux connaître cette communauté de 8000 habitants, qui, en se développant, réhabilite sa langue et sa culture mohawk. Dix ans de pratique professionnelle à Kahnawake m’ont convaincu que cette identité collective restaurée et valorisée n’a cessé de protéger mes patients. Une perception subjective confirmée par de nombreux épidémiologiques qui considèrent l’amérindianité comme un important facteur de résilience. Dans notre travail thérapeutique, nous allons sans cesse rencontrer ce double identitaire : il est, à la fois, cet Autre ouvert, partie prenante de la modernité, dont les valeurs universelles parcourent la planète. Et en même temps inscrit dans l’histoire, ce même Autre insaisissable, souvent dernier refuge identitaire que nous devons respecter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsy CauseSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207