Bibliographic record
Abstract
The weekly newspaper has p.[1-3] in English and p.[3-4] in Spanish. Los Angeles Star in English includes headings: [p.1]: [col.2] "Election notice", "The following persons were appointed by the Board of Supervisors on the 11th day of August A.D. 1854", "Election proclamation", [col.3] "Faithfulness in little things", [col.4] "Live cattle weighed by measure", "A vicious sheep", "Remarkable discovery", "An arctic continent", "Cure for palpitation", [col.5] "Progress of steam navigation", "An extraordinary time piece", "Firemen vs celestials"; [p.2]: [col.1] "Regular Democratic nominations", "The Know-Nothings", [col.2] "Fruit -- the season", "The weather", "As many of our readers feel a deep interest in the decisions of the Board of Land Commissioners and as everything relating to this subject pro or con especially in this and the adjoining counties should be received according to its merits we publish the following letter from Mr. Sexton desiring however that the peaceful citizens of San Gabriel may have no cause to oppose the final confirmation of land claims in that vicinity", "Combatibus", [col.3] "News by the Goliah", [col.4] "U.S. Land Commission", "Atlantic news", "European news", [col.5] "From Salt Lake", "To the members of the Common Council of the city of Los Angeles"; [p.3]: [col.1] "Nebraska and Kansas", "The rapidity with which the revenue of the United States is increasing is without a precedent in the history of our Government [sic]", "Annexation of an Italian principality to the United States".; La Estrella in Spanish includes headings: [p.3]: [col.2] "De la prensa Espanola", [col.3] "España", "Una carta de Washigton [sic] dirigida al North American de Filadelfia dice que es inexacta la noticia de que se hayan recibido últimamen te avisos contrarios al plan de anexion de las islas de Sandwich a los Estados Unidos", "Publica un diario de Nueva York la lineas siguientes, dirijidas contra el progreso de las contribuciones y el tratado con Méjico", "Rusia", [col.4] "Oriente", "Valiente despique", "Al Honorable Concilio Comun de la ciudad de Los Angeles"; [p.4]: [col.1] "'El Times' de Boston ha publicado un articulo relativo a la 'extencion del area' y al 'd[e]stino manifesto'", "Rasonamiento de Cacumatzin", [col.2] "Edicto de eleccion".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.136 | 0.057 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".