Bibliographic record
Abstract
The English weekly newspaper, Los Angeles Star includes headings: [p.1]: [col.2] "Selected poetry: A gem from Fanny Forrester", "Longfellow thus happily describes the gradual coming on of the shadows of twilight", "Preventing an elopement", "Niagara Falls", [col.4] "A night scene in London", "Better get 'em first", "Jenny Lind", [col.5] "Opinions of the private secretary", "Carrying deadly weapons", "The Washington monument"; [p.2]: [col.1] "The City election", "Emigration to Sonora", [col.2] "Trouble with the Indians on Kern River", [col.3] "Later from Kern River", "Mayor's message", "Los Angeles municipal election returns", "San Bernardino municipal election", [col.4] "A card to the public", "Massacre of passengers at Panama", [col.5] "Water route to Salt Lake", "From Nicaragua"; [p.3]: [col.1] "Atlantic news", "From Europe", "The birth of the king of Algiers", "The baptism -- prayer of the Archbishop"; [p.4]: [col.1] "Memory", "Joan of Arc was born in 1411, the daughter of a poor peasant in the province of Lorraine", [col.2] "A strong-minded candidate for matrimony", "Picture of United States Senators", [col.3] "A beautiful sentiment], "The dead -- curious calculations", "The eye sight" "Decency is a matter of latitude", "Charitable bequest".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.170 | 0.084 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".