MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7131888775 · doi:10.25549/lastar-c68-387

Los Angeles Star, vol. 8, no. 30, December 4, 1858

2021· dataset· en· W7131888775 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Unknown

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Southern California Digital Library · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtState (computer science)Gold rushQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The English weekly newspaper, Los Angeles Star includes headings: [p.1]: [col.3] "[From the New York Times] An uncommonly sharp female confidence operator--her extensive operation in southern cities, in California, and in Texas, with a male accomplice--the swindlers still at large", [col.4] "An Artesian well was completed at Louisville, October 12th", "Secretary Cass had been quite ill recently, but has now recovered so far as to be able to visit the Department during the day", "California grapes in New York", "The Atlantic telegraph cable", [col.5] "Baron Humbodlt [sic]"; [p.2]: [col.1] "The recent execution", "The Illinois election", "The late State Agricultural Fair--the premiums", "Premium for grape culture", [col.2] "The Gila gold mines", "The steamer 'Comet'", [col.3] "By the overland mail", "Execution of Pancho Daniel", "Lee's circus", [col.4] "District Court--First Judicial District, Hon. Benj. Hayes--Judge", "City improvements", "Lt. Beale's party and the U.S. troops", "Comanches and the United States"; [p.3]: [col.1] "State of California, County of San Bernardino, in the District Court of the First Judicial District", The Paraguay expedition", "State of California, Los Angeles County, in the District Court of the First Judicial District"; [p.4]: [col.1] "By authority. By the President of the United States".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1720.102

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Southern California Digital Library→French-language works237,207→