MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131914002

信息不对称、会计稳健性与集团信贷模式

2015· article· W7131914002 on OpenAlexaff
夏子航, Dengbiao Chen, 马忠

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Technology and Strategies
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Identification (biology)Product (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本文考察上市公司与外部资本市场之间的信息不对称对集团母子公司之间债务分布决策的影响,以及会计稳健性在债务主体选择决策中发挥的信息调节效应,研究发现:当信息不对称程度较低时,子公司会更多地选择自主承担债务融资,但随着信息不对称程度的提高,债务融资则更多集中于母公司,表明信息不对称降低了子公司自主承担债务融资的能力,上述倾向在子公司业务比重大的企业集团中表现得更为明显。进一步地,条件稳健性显著缓解了信息不对称对子公司自主承担债务融资的约束,而非条件稳健性却加剧了上述约束。研究揭示了信息不对称除影响公司信贷总体水平外,还是影响集团母子公司之间债务融资主体选择的重要因素,并且两类会计稳健性在集团信贷主体决策中存在信息效应异质性,因此深化了会计稳健性与信贷决策关系的研究。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositorySame topicMilitary Technology and StrategiesFrench-language works237,207