MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131921305

De historische mijnbouw in Zuid-Noorwegen en haar Nederlandse connecties. Dl.1

2013· article· nl· W7131921305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTNO Repository · 2013
Typearticle
Languagenl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMetallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrithRailway lineQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

De zilvermijnen van Kongsberg, de kobaltmijnen van Modum, de koperwerken van Røros en - nog steeds van groot economisch belang - de titaniummijn van de Jossingford in Vest-Agder zijn alom bekende voorbeelden van de rijke Noorse mijnbouwtraditie. Mineralen uit deze voorkomens zijn aanwezig in de collecties van alle grote Europese en Noord- Amerikaanse mineralogische musea. Minder bekend is de mijnbouw in de kuststrook van de provincies Aust-Agdet en Telemark, tussen Kristiansand en de Osloslenk. ln deze bijdrage wordt hiervan een historisch en mineralogisch overzicht gegeven. De belangrijkste historische ertsen en grondstoffen waren ijzer, fosfaat (apatiet), rutiel, veldspaat (voor porceleinproductie) en in mindere mate nog een reeks andere metalen (lood-zinkzilver koper, nikkel en naar men claimt zelfs goud). In het eerste deel van dit artikel behandelen we de ijzermijnbouw.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it