MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131921532

Xibei's Business Model: Creating Shared Value for Stakeholders

2020· other· en· W7131921532 on OpenAlexaff
Meng Rui, Qiong Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreating shared valueValue (mathematics)Business modelValue propositionBusiness valueValue creation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2019, Xibei sat firmly in the top tier of the Chinese catering industry, relying on its business model of creating shared value with all stakeholders. Jia Guolong, founder and chairman of Xibei, said that it was not because he or Xibei was noble, but due to commercial aspects. The value-sharing model aims to get greater returns from these shared values to build Xibei into a global giant. For the last 31 years, Xibei had developed a positive cycle of value creation with this model, and it grew more competitive. By the end of June 2019, Xibei had opened 350 stores in 56 cities across the country. In the future, Xibei aims to open its stores all over the world. Jia realized that it would be a great challenge to apply the value-sharing model in a larger market because stronger abilities to share and collect value were required in a larger market. After sharing business value or interest with more stakeholders, he hoped to receive more returns in terms of business value. But what was the best way to do it?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207