The palisade and gate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The palisade is by far the largest element of the tenth-century monument complex at Jelling. Its size alone is impressive, but equally remarkable is the geometric precision and the enormous timber consumption, which can be determined from the archaeological evidence. The most significant stretches are in the north, where the length of the northern line has been precisely determined by the two identified corners, respectively in the north-west and north-east, and in the east. Shorter parts have been investigated to the west and south, and have made it possible to determine the course of all four sides of the palisade and establish the approximate location of the two southern corners. There is considerable variation in the level of preservation of the individual sections. In the northern part of the area the topsoil layer was thin, and the palisade ditch took the form of a continuous dark course against the background of light yellow subsoil. The southern part is much better preserved, and the dimensions of individual planks and posts could be recorded. In the pond Smededammen oak timbers were still preserved in the waterlogged, oxygen-lacking bottom layers of the pond. The chapter begins with a description of the appearance and construction of the palisade, followed by a discussion of a gate to the north and evidence of transportation in the landscape. Finally, the dating of the overall structure is summarised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".