MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131947260

Long Bakery's Choice: The Flow or the Product?

2019· other· W7131947260 on OpenAlexaff
Dongsheng 周东生, 阮丽旸

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2019
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)Work (physics)Flow conditionsHeat flowFlow properties
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

烘焙龙是马海华和龙玥于2016年1月创立的烘焙品牌,其初心是做“全宇宙最好的吐司”。在消费升级的趋势下,烘焙龙以精品吐司这一单品切入烘焙行业的细分市场,并逐渐形成了“大烘焙房+小烘焙店+微烘焙群”的经营模式。经过一年多的发展,烘焙龙以优质的产品获得了一定的市场认可,并得到盒马鲜生(以下简称盒马)的青睐,于2017年12月开始在盒马销售。然而,合作并不如想象的顺利,烘焙龙的品牌在盒马上并没有得到凸显,盒马销售隔夜吐司(仍在保质期内)的行为也与烘焙龙的原则相悖。马海华和龙玥需要做出决策:是坚持产品为王,放弃与自身定位不太吻合的盒马?还是在新零售的风口中为了获取流量而抱紧这棵大树?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0190.017
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207