MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7131955805

Solid state lighting annex: visual perception under energy-efficient light sources: detection of the stroboscopic effect under low levels of SVM: final report

2019· report· en· W7131955805 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
J. A. Veitch, Christophe Martinsons

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2019
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlickerStroboscopeVisibilityLuminancePopulationPerceptionEuropean commission
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporal Light Modulation (TLM) or “flicker” as it is colloquially known can have visual, neurobiological, performance, and cognitive effects on viewers. The International Electrotechnical Commission and the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage have identified two metrics that may be used to characterize lighting systems’ TLM: PstLM, to predict visible flicker at frequencies below 80 Hz; and SVM, Stroboscopic Visibility Measure, for the higher frequency stroboscopic effect. While scientific development of these metrics and their associated measurement protocols continue, there is a parallel discussion taking place concerning the appropriate levels for these metrics in regulations. The SSL Annex commissioned a study from researchers at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and the Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment (CSTB) in France, to investigate detection rates for the stroboscopic effect in response to commercially-available light emitting diode (LED) light sources characterized using the SVM, and particularly to assess the population variability in this perception among people sensitive to visual stress. The final report on this work provides insight into both stroboscopic visibility and the acceptability of the conditions for the full sample of 85 people and for the more sensitive individuals. The report follows the publication of a peer-reviewed journal article in Lighting Research and Technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→