Childhood and Growing Up in Fantasy Stories: Peter Pan and Pippi Longstocking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Škotski književnik za djecu James Matthew Barrie i švedska književnica za djecu Astrid Lindgren donijeli su novu vrstu priče, fantastičnu priču. Potaknuti Lewisom Carrollom i njegovom Alisom u Zemlji Čudesa i oni su se okušali u tom smjeru i napisali svoja djela Petar Pan i Pipi Duga Čarapa zbog kojih su danas najprepoznatljiviji. Djela su im donijela veliku slavu među djecom, a i među odraslima. Priča o dječaku koji ne želi odrasti i o djevojčici koja se protivi autoritetu učinila su djetinjstvo dragocjenim i posebnim razdobljem. Njihove su priče originalne i jedinstvene jer postoji samo jedna Pipi Duga Čarapa i jedan Petar Pan, a sve ostalo su ne baš uspješni pokušaji kada se usporede s originalnom verzijom. Da bi fantastična priča bila uspješna, mora biti emocionalno uvjerljiva i iskrena, a da bi bila iskrena, mora biti odsjaj osobnog duha i temperamenta, a upravo su takva oba djela. Glavne junake priče predstavljaju djeca i njihova igra i mašta, a to je nešto što svako dijete ima u sebi. Ovaj rad prikazuje književno stvaralaštvo Jamesa Matthewa Barrija i Astrid Lindgren, fantastične elemente u pričama te samo djetinjstvo i odrastanje kroz oba djela.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".