MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131972429

ICBC in the Digital Era (B)

Xiaoming Zhu, Qiong Zhu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2014
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital eraThe InternetDigital healthPostal serviceDigital radio
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

不确定性已经成为当今企业面临的常态。互联网、移动互联网技术的发展,引发了很多行业的变革,而变革的方向却充满了不确定性,例如互联网金融的挑战,让金融行业未来发展模式充满不确定性。因此,如何预见不确定性、如何解决信息不对称问题,成为置身其中的企业不得不思考的问题。尽管中国工商银行已是全球第一大银行,互联网金融的逆袭,也让它的未来遇到许多挑战。工行董事长姜建清认为:未来不确定性的挑战不在于技术,而在于思想和观念。工行只有用互联网思维替代传统思维,才能不被取代,最终成为互联网生态中的资金、信息和服务中介。本系列共三个案例,B案例描写了工行在遭遇互联网金融的逆袭时,如何搭建互联网金融平台,甚至跨界做电子商务:从“银行信息化”到“信息化银行”,究竟是文字游戏还是思维颠覆?工行怎样借鉴互联网金融理念,获得从客户出发的决策思维?工行的电子商务战略,与其他互联网电商相比,有哪些思维上的创新和超越?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207