MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131984027

Luckin: Rising from the Ashes

2023· other· W7131984027 on OpenAlexaff
Chao 梁超, 朱琼

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2023
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Government (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

瑞幸案例描写了瑞幸在造假消息发布前后的战略、商业模式和运营战略的变化。在造假消息发布之前,瑞幸采取高速扩张战略:快速开店、巨额融资、大量补贴客户,而支撑运营的是其早已打造的由数据驱动的线上获客门店履约的咖啡新零售系统。造假消息发布后,由于瑞幸已给客户发放了大量产品折扣券,因此,瑞幸门店没有被冷落反而迎来客户“挤兑式”下单。在门店保持运营的同时,瑞幸新管理团队暂停了之前的战略,开始追求经营业绩,将目标客户重定位为年轻人,并据此制定了新运营战略,增加了建立客户私域流量池、密集推新产品、精细化运营门店等新举措,实现了业绩的不断增长。于是,2022年8月,瑞幸在发布其第二季度财报的同时声称它已经“涅槃重生”。然而,此时的中国咖啡市场已吸引来了各路资本和它们助推的品牌,与它们同台竞争,瑞幸的长势能一直持续吗?它如何才能保持竞争优势?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.098

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207