Relación de la calidad de vida y la adherencia al TARV con las capacidades cognitivas en personas con VIH en un hospital nacional de Lima
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar la correlación de la calidad de vida y la adherencia a la Terapia Antirretroviral (TARV), con las capacidades cognitivas en personas que presentan el virus de Inmunodeficiencia humana en un hospital nacional de Lima. La población está conformada por 144 personas quienes asistieron a su control de terapia antirretroviral en un centro hospitalario de Lima Metropolitana. Se usó el diseño descriptivo – correlacional y los instrumentos fueron la escala de índice de calidad de vida -adaptación de Mezzich; el cuestionario de valoración de la adherencia de Echevarría y la prueba de evaluación cognitiva de Montreal. Se obtuvo que existe una relación estadísticamente significativa entre calidad de vida, adherencia a la terapia antirretroviral y capacidades cognitivas en personas que poseen el Virus de la Inmunodeficiencia Humana en un hospital nacional de Lima.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".