MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7131999950

Objection as a legal remedy according to the General administrative procedure act

2024· dissertation· hr· W7131999950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darija Nađ

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository Faculty of Law University of Zagreb · 2024
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOmbudsman and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisprudenceMeaning (existential)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prigovor kao jedan od dva redovita pravna lijeka koja predviđa Zakon o općem upravnom postupku veoma je važan za pravnu zaštitu građana jer je omogućio ali i znatno proširio doseg pravne zaštite. Pravna zaštita proširena je na upravne ugovore i na postupanja javnopravnih tijela i pružatelja javnih usluga i to u slučajevima kada se ne donosi upravni akt odnosno izvan upravnog postupka. U radu će se stoga prvo definirati što je upravni postupak te važnost samoga ZUP-a kroz njegova načela, kao i razvitak ZUP-a i njegova obilježja u modernoj hrvatskoj upravi. Definira se sam institut prigovora u okvirima ZUP-a tj. njegove opće odredbe, a potom i posebne odredbe, odnosno provodi se analiza za svaku vrstu prigovora pojedinačno. Naposljetku se iznose zajedničke odlike prigovora prema ZUP-u kao i njihove razlike, te se za sam kraj navode i neke specifičnosti vezane za upravne sporove.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository Faculty of Law University of ZagrebSame topicOmbudsman and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207