MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132003752

A unified data platform for maritime analytics and predictive modeling in Arctic operations

2025· article· en· W7132003752 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Balsher Singh, Joshua Barnes, Allison Kennedy, Matthew Hamilton, Samarasimha Reddy Chittamuru

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmarkingInterpretabilityDashboardAnalyticsGeospatial analysisVisualizationField (mathematics)Data visualizationTurnkeyUnivariate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the shipping industry embraces digitalization, marine operations generate vast and diverse data streams, offering significant opportunities for advanced analytics. This work presents an advanced software platform powered by a high-performance Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) database, centralizing data from multiple Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) vessels, including the Larsen, Laurier, Cygnus, Tully, and Tanu. The system integrates operational data (e.g., fuel consumption, navigation) and environmental datasets (e.g., ERA5 weather, ocean currents, ice charts) while harmonizing sensor nomenclature for consistency. For example, vessel-specific labels such as "ENG_RPM" and "ENGINE_SPEED" are standardized to a unified "Engine RPM" field using a middle vocabulary layer between database and, enabling consistent cross-vessel comparisons. The platform's visualization tool enables quality assurance (QA), exploratory data analysis (EDA), and comparative analysis across vessels using scatter plots, trajectory maps, and fuel consumption summaries. Its emissions module provides detailed hourly and trip-based emissions calculations, supporting regulatory compliance and environmental assessments. Benchmarking features include univariate and bivariate plots, time series boxplots, and heatmaps for cross-vessel comparisons under varying conditions. A key innovation is its accessible machine learning (ML) tool, allowing non-expert users to train predictive models on custom time intervals for forecasting metrics like fuel consumption, speed, and emissions. A dedicated ML Model Explainer dashboard enhances interpretability with regression statistics, feature importance rankings, and dependency charts. Additionally, the platform supports strategic planning through historical route mapping and predictive analytics, enabling users to test models under Arctic conditions. By integrating visualization, benchmarking, and ML-driven forecasting, this platform enhances maritime decision-making, optimizing operational efficiency and environmental sustainability across challenging marine environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207