MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132014151

Reforming Performance Management at Hospital A: Delicacy Management Challenges

2015· other· W7132014151 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Han, Ziqian Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2015
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDelicacyPerformance managementQuality managementPerformance measurementQuality (philosophy)Human resource management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A医院是国有大型三甲公立医院,在所在城市和区域的大型三甲医院中属中上等,争取向一流医院迈进。同其他公立医院所采取的主流做法类似,A医院也采用了开源节流的方法实现自我发展,收入迅速增加。政府提倡公立医院回归公益性,因此对发展速度设置了限制,也对三甲医院的定位提出了更高的要求。A医院需要在有限的资源内,通过吸引一流人才来实现学科的突破,同时还要兼顾现有员工的利益。A医院决心通过实施量化考核,并使之与薪酬挂钩的方法来提高全员积极性。但是,要兼顾医疗服务的量与质并非易事,量化考核以及新的激励制度是否真的能够起到激励作用,以及新制度的公平性是否被大多数人认可,依然是一个艰巨的挑战。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0220.027
Scholarly communication0.0370.018
Open science0.0040.013
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207