Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with Croatian-English bilingualism and is organised into two main sections. The first section is the theoretical background to the second part, a research which was conducted for the purpose of this paper. The first chapter deals with different definitions of bilingualism. The second chapter concentrates on bilingualism and biculturalism, as well as on identity of bilingual and bicultural people. In the third chapter different types of bilingualism are presented. The fourth chapter explains the new phenomenon called heritage language and heritage speakers, as well as its connection with Croatian-English bilinguals. The fifth chapter offers an overview of the history of Croatian migrations in English-speaking countries. As far as the practical section is concerned, the aim is to analyse the language use of families of Croatian background who live in one of the English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada and the United States) both from the sociolinguistic and linguistic point of view. Therefore, the aim of the research and the methodology are presented at the beginning of the second section. The data and translations are analysed in two next chapters. Furthermore, the possible predictions for the Croatian community and its identity are presented in the eight chapter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".