MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132027975

Implications of COVID-19 for electricity use in commercial smart buildings in Canada: a case study

2022· article· en· W7132027975 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Hadia Awad, Araz Ashouri, Farid Bahiraei

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCOVID-19 impact on air quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsElectricityMains electricityGovernment (linguistics)Electricity demandOrder (exchange)Electricity generationElectricity retailing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the country-wide lockdown for public employees in Canada took place because of the COVID-19 pandemic, all non-essential commercial activities were shut down and the majority of office workers began working from home. As a result, a considerable change in occupancy-driven electricity use was observed in commercial buildings. In this study, two years of hourly electricity use data for 27 government buildings equipped with smart energy management systems are analyzed to quantify those changes and understand the economic and environmental impacts. Time-series decomposition methods are applied to metered electricity data in order to isolate characteristics such as base load, peak load, and estimated occupancy. Results indicate a reduction of 10% in electricity use and 1,000 tons of CO₂ emissions in the year following the pandemic. However, the pattern was not uniform in all buildings and some showed increased baseloads and weekend usage. The reasons behind such differences are further investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicCOVID-19 impact on air qualityFrench-language works237,207