Sistem vrednotenja vpliva gorskega kolesarstva na obstoječe gozdne prometnice in planinske poti
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mountain biking (MTB) is a branch of cycling, which has started to develop in the 1970's in USA and Canada.At the beginning of 1980's, it slowly emerged across Europe and also to Slovenia.Today, there are more than 70.000 fans of MTB in Slovenia alone and according to some data, the number is still growing rapidly.Beautiful forests and hilly landscape with countless hiking trails may be the strongest reasons for popularization of MTB in Slovenia.Ski areas also provide a great part of MTB infrastructure during summer and are therefore used as so called 'bike parks'.Regardless of the fact that some American studies found hardly any and sometimes no influence of MTB on hiking trails or forest paths (when compared to hiking and riding), this brand of activity in nature still has many opponents in Slovenia.There has been some evidence of conflicts between mountain bikers and other trail users, yet the greatest boundary for this activity remains the restrictive legislation.The regulation of prohibition of motorized vehicles in natural environment from year 1995 applied also for bicycles.Despite the revocation of this prohibition in June 2014, mountain biking in environment is still limited due to Law on Forests and Law on mountain trails.Consequently, every mountain biker, who rides outside forest, asphalt or dirt roads, is technically in violation (there are a few exceptions).The regulation therefore also negatively effects touristic development and development of hospitality industry, since the number of foreign mountain bikers, who come to ride in Slovenia, increases every year.In 2014, there have been some plans on enforcing a new law in this area, called the zoning law.It predicts the prohibition of MTB only on areas, which are environmentally protected, such as Natura 2000, Nature conservation act, etc.Since there are many such protected zones, there is a risk that the new law will not be effective.Consequently, I decided to make my Bachelor's degree theses on creating a simple, yet objective system of measuring potential carrying capacity of existing hiking trails and forest paths in relation with mountain biking.I used hill Mrzlica (1122 m) with surroundings in hills of Posavje as my study area.My method represents one of modules at creating a system of MTB effects on existing hiking trails and forest paths valuation.Through use of multi attributive decision making method DEX and its decision making software, called DEXi, I created a model with universal group of criteria (incline, base type, vegetation, frequency of use, etc.), which can be evaluated regardless of the terrain type and give us an objective assessment on acceptability of MTB on studied area.It also gives us options for improvement of conditions for both pedestrians (hikers) and mountain bikers.It turned out that all studied routes have at least sufficient, in some cases even high values of MTB acceptability.I therefore conclude that in general, the potential carrying capacity of evaluated hiking trails and forest paths for mountain biking is high.Approach presented in the theses allows us a quick and effective examination of MTB acceptability through individual 'one case at a time' research of any area with existing trails in Slovenia.Since MTB in Slovenia has many enthusiasts, it is necessary to find a sustainable solution that would satisfy all trail users and either support or rebut MTB acceptability on existing trails.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it