MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132063200

Comparative Analysis of Single-Component Excipients and Substances with Amelanchier alnifolia l. Fruits Extract

2025· article· en· W7132063200 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLithuanian University of Health Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMicroencapsulation and Drying Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBerryLactoseMoistureDeciduous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Saskatoon berry (Amelanchier alnifolia L.) is deciduous shrub, that are found in forests or thickets. Fruits: small, black-blue berries, accumulating flavanoids, phenolic compounds and anthocyanins. Due to its composition, particularly rich in bioactive compounds, especially polyphenols, the Saskatoon berry has the potential to act as a highly beneficial antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, hypoglycemic, antidiabetic, and antiradical agent. Additionally, it can regulate glucose levels and glycogen accumulation in the human diet, showcasing significant nutritional and nutraceutical value [1]. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the properties of powders and powders with Amelanchier alnifolia L. fruits extract. Methods. The berries were sampled from Rietavas district in 2023 July. The best ultrasonic extraction results were obtained with freeze – drying berries at 30% ethanol concentration. Powders containing Amelanchier alnifolia L. extract are manufactured using liquid/solid technology. Selected excipients: microcrystalline cellulose, lactose monohydrate and magnesium aluminium metasilicate (Neusilin ® US2). Comparison of powder moisture content, powder flowability, angle of repose, and tap density. Results. Results showed significant differences on the powders. The best results were obtained in determining the moisture content of lactose monohydrate and Amelanchier alnifolia L. powders (1,36%). The best results for the flowability (1,097 g/s) and cone angle (27˚) of powders were obtained for lactose monohydrate and Amelanchier alnifolia L. powders. The best tap density was determined for magnesium aluminum metasilicate (Neusilin ® US2) powder (0,156 g/ml). The highest moisture content was found in magnesium aluminum metasilicate (Neusilin ® US2) powders (10,33%). The largest cone angle (52˚) was in magnesium aluminum metasilicate (Neusilin ® US2) powders. The worst flowability (1,765 g/s) were found in microcrystalline cellulose and Saskatoon berry powders. Lactose monohydrate powders had the lowest tap density (0,833 g/ml). Conclusion. After evaluating the quality of the powder, it was determined that the best properties were achieved with lactose monohydrate and Amelanchier alnifolia L. powders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it