Development of a multi-axis active seat mount system for helicopter aircrew whole-body vibration reduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the development and evaluation of a proof-of-concept multi-axis and actively controlled helicopter seat mount system for aircrew whole-body vibration reduction. The multi-axis seat mount is designed to be installed between the helicopter seat floor and the seat supporting structure to minimize the impact on crashworthiness requirements of the helicopter seat. The design involves multiple miniature force actuators to counteract the vibrations of the seat frame and occupant transmitted from the helicopter floor in three orthogonal directions. The actuators are controlled by an adaptive feedforward filtered-x least mean square algorithm to cancel the helicopter floor vibration input. The prototype active seat mount design was tested in various configurations with a shaker table providing representative Bell-412 helicopter vibration inputs. Test results demonstrated that the vibrations of the seat frame and mannequin occupant body were suppressed simultaneously, and the major N/rev harmonic peaks of the occupant's whole-body vibration were reduced by 95%. This demonstrated that the multi-axis active seat mount design can mitigate the whole-body vibration exposure of the helicopter aircrew to improve their ride quality and reduce adverse health effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".