MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132076696

El Projecte Indigenous Languages Technology (Ilt) Del Consell Nacional D’investigació De Canadà, I El Seu Context

2021· article· ca· W7132076696 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roland Kühn

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2021
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultilingual Education and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)IndigenousWork (physics)Ethnography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En les últimes dècades, s’han creat centenars de projectes de revitalització i recuperació de llengües indígenes per tot Canadà. La majoria es troben a comunitats indígenes; d’altres se centren a universitats. Varien en dimensió des de les ambicioses iniciatives multilingües del First Peoples’ Cultural Council (FPCC)que es troba dins de i és finançat per la Província de Columbia Britànica, i és actiu allà i a altres regions de Canadà (https://fpcc.ca/), fins a iniciatives d’un o dos voluntaris sense finançament a comunitats remotes

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicMultilingual Education and Policy→French-language works237,207→