MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132092229

Mamų žinių apie kūdikių iki 6 mėnesių natūralų maitinimą vertinimas.

2020· dissertation· lt· W7132092229 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Žvironienė, Justina,

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Repository of Utenos kolegija Higher Education Institution · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagelt
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingQuarter (Canadian coin)Natural (archaeology)Breast feedingBreast milkInfant feedingPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to analyze mothers’ knowledge about the natural breastfeeding. Breast milk is undoubtedly the healthy food with all the necessary nutrients for the full development of a child. However, different problems can sometimes arise due to various circumstances. Therefore, this issue is one of the most important nowadays. The aim of the paper is to analyze mothers’ knowledge about the natural breastfeeding. The goals of the paper are to reveal mothers’ attitude towards the breastfeeding; to evaluate the benefits of natural breastfeeding for a mother and a child; to analyze mothers’ knowledge about the natural breastfeeding and to solve the relevant problems. The qualitative research was carried out in Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos the Children’s Hospital Newborn Department. The research lasted from 14th October till 31st October, 2019. It included 50 respondents. Conclusions. After revealing mothers’ attitude towards the natural breastfeeding it is clear that all mothers admit, breastfeeding corresponds to the concept of natural nourishment. More than a quarter of respondents are of the opinion that it is necessary to breastfeed a baby with natural food for up to 6 months and more. The quarter of the respondents think that it is easily digestible and absorbable food. What is more, the breastfeeding prevents from diseases and infections. Considering the benefits of breastfeeding for a mother and a child it is clear that mothers have no doubt in this point. Half of them think that it is the healthy food. A quarter of the respondents admit that the biggest benefit of breastfeeding is the protection of different infections. Moreover, it is the easily digestible and absorbable food. The respondents do not doubt about the benefits of breastfeeding for their health. A quarter of them are sure that it stops the bleeding. Some respondents believe that breastfeeding prevents from osteoporosis. After analyzing mothers’ knowledge about the natural breastfeeding and the problems that may occur and their solutions it is clear that more than a half of the respondents do not have any difficulties at all. Less that a half of the respondents say that one of the problems may be the excess of milk. Some mothers point out that the problems for them are hard and sore breasts, deformed and painful nipples, lack of milk. The biggest part of the respondents search for the information about the breastfeeding on the internet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Repository of Utenos kolegija Higher Education InstitutionSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207