The Influence of Concentration with a Membrane Process of Reverse Osmosis on the Colour Compounds of Cabernet Sauvignon Wine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Utjecaj koncentriranja crnog vina Cabernet Sauvignon procesom reverzne osmoze te utjecaj na zadržavanje tvari boje pri četiri različita tlaka (25, 35, 45, 55 bara) i dva temperaturna režima (s primjenom i bez primjene hlađenja) cilj je provedbe ovog diplomskog rada. Postupak koncentriranja proveden je na uređaju za reverznu osmozu Lab Unit 20 s kompozitnim membranama Alfa Laval-RO tipa RO98pHt M20 složenih u pločasti modul. Profil tvari boje vina detektiran je spektrofotometrijskim analizama te metodom visoko tekućinske kromatografije (HPLC). Dobiveni rezultati pokazuju visoku učinkovitost postupka koncentriranja vina tehnologijom reverzne osmoze. Optimalni parametri zadržavanja antocijana, flavonoida, fenolnih kiselina i ostalih vrlo osjetljivih sastojaka vina postignuti su pri procesnom tlaka od 55 bara s primjenom hlađenja. Suprotno tome, najveći gubitak kako pojedinačnih tako i ukupnih polifenolnih komponenti zamijećen je pri tlaku 45 i 55 bara bez mogućnosti hlađenja sustava.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".