MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132112836

Chacha Food: Conquering the Snack Food Market

2023· other· W7132112836 on OpenAlexaff
Tian 朱天, 陈炳亮

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2023
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)Food supplySnack foodFood processingFood industry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

陈先保是洽洽食品的创始人,一次乘火车长途出行的经历,让他意识到瓜子这一零食品类还有很大的提升空间。瓜子业务的壁垒并不高,竞争一直很激烈。洽洽采取了很多创新的做法,包括生产工艺由“炒”变“煮”,开发专门的煮制设备和生产线,大手笔投入营销推广等等。洽洽很快在瓜子品类上脱颖而出,市占率不断提高。 在瓜子大获成功后,洽洽又尝试进入薯片、果冻等休闲食品品类。果冻业务虽经多年努力,但增长有限,已被剥离。最近几年新拓展的混合坚果业务增长很快,陈先保希望把它打造成像瓜子一样的头部大单品,这个品类是正确的选择么?洽洽正在朝百亿销售目标迈进,但中国瓜子市场逐渐饱和。休闲食品行业是一个万亿规模的大市场,洽洽未来增长之路该如何走呢?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0130.014
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207