MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132130880

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN AND CANADIAN PROGRAM OF CHILDREN´S TENNIS

2019· dissertation· hr· W7132130880 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina Pilaš

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb - KIFoREP · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagehr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSports, Gender, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)Test (biology)Duration (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

U ovom diplomskom radu prikazana su dva pristupa rada u tenisu s djecom mlađom od deset godina. U radu se iznose osnovne karakteristike europskog (Play and Stay) i kanadskog (Kids Tennis) programa dječjih teniskih igraonica te se ukazuje na njihove minimalne razlike. Naglašava se važnost poduke tenisa kroz igru, kao i važnost dječjih natjecanja.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb - KIFoREPSame topicSports, Gender, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207