MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132131965

Vanke Property: Service Transformation

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2016
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Process (computing)Transformation (genetics)Set (abstract data type)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例以中国一家领先的物业管理公司为例,探讨该公司在物业行业转型的探索过程中可能遇到的行业责任边界模糊问题,以及这个问题所引发的相关人力资源问题,包括人才的选用育留等等。案例公司万科物业隶属于以住宅为主的大型房地产公司,主要服务于万科住宅。中国的物业管理行业服务质量参差不齐,万科物业的高质量服务是万科出售住宅的重要卖点之一。万科内部曾经做过多次客户调查,超过75%的客户选择万科的房子是因为希望享受万科物业的服务。随着房地产开发业务的迅猛增长,万科物业也走上了迅速壮大的道路,但在人员素质和服务意识普遍不高的背景下,万科物业的服务质量也面临着很多挑战,包括服务本身的伦理道德和法律合规性的问题,以及员工素质是否能够跟上、思维能否迅速转换的问题。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.176

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207