MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132131965

Vanke Property: Service Transformation

2016· other· W7132131965 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Han, Ziqian Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2016
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Process (computing)Transformation (genetics)Set (abstract data type)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例以中国一家领先的物业管理公司为例,探讨该公司在物业行业转型的探索过程中可能遇到的行业责任边界模糊问题,以及这个问题所引发的相关人力资源问题,包括人才的选用育留等等。案例公司万科物业隶属于以住宅为主的大型房地产公司,主要服务于万科住宅。中国的物业管理行业服务质量参差不齐,万科物业的高质量服务是万科出售住宅的重要卖点之一。万科内部曾经做过多次客户调查,超过75%的客户选择万科的房子是因为希望享受万科物业的服务。随着房地产开发业务的迅猛增长,万科物业也走上了迅速壮大的道路,但在人员素质和服务意识普遍不高的背景下,万科物业的服务质量也面临着很多挑战,包括服务本身的伦理道德和法律合规性的问题,以及员工素质是否能够跟上、思维能否迅速转换的问题。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0110.018
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207