MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132140966

Shanghai Jinqiao (Group) Co., Ltd. (A): Jinqiao’s Experience and Challenge

2013· other· W7132140966 on OpenAlexaff
Weiru Chen, Leiping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2013
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Perspective (graphical)Focus (optics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

作为浦东重点开发区之一,金桥开发区在不断发展中,也存在一些问题。2013年,上海金桥(集团)有限公司的高管在会议上讨论着公司发展的未来。案例A主要阐述了金桥公司的发展情况,指出先进制造、产城融合与产业转型是公司发展的三大特色,同时分析了上海及周边开发区,提出公司在新一轮竞争中,面临的困难和挑战;案例B阐述了在2013年8月22日,国务院正式批准设立中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的背景下,临港综合区开发项目的相关规划及战略思考。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.012
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207