← Back to cohort
Improved reconstruction of highly boosted ▫$tau$▫-lepton pairs in the ▫$tautau to (munu_{mu}nu_{tau})$▫(hadrons + ▫$nu_{tau}$▫) decay channels with the ATLAS detector
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenueRUNG · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNarodowa Agencja Wymiany AkademickiejForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyNational Science and Technology CouncilEuropean Social FundRoyal SocietyCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueEuropean Regional Development FundBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyCarl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig ForskningFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftGeneralitat de CatalunyaGeneralitat ValencianaAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloUK Research and InnovationIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareMinistero dell'Università e della RicercaGrantová Agentura České RepublikyAustrian Science FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeVetenskapsrådetNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science FoundationBaden-Württemberg StiftungH2020 European Research CouncilNorges ForskningsrådAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFDanmarks GrundforskningsfondTürkiye Enerji, Nükleer ve Maden Araştırma KurumuCanarieCERNCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsDetectorChannel (broadcasting)Noise (video)Atlas (anatomy)
DOInot available
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.622
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno