Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ovaj rad nadahnut je člankom Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Iznesen je rezultat John S. Bella kojim se odbacuje teorija skrivenih varijabli u kvantnoj mehanici i time se opovrgava teza Alberta Einsteina o spooky-action at the distance pri spregnutim česticama. Dan je pregled osnovnih pojmova kvantnog računanja. Uvodi se pojam qubita te reprezentacije istog na Blochovoj sferi. Definirana su najčeše korištena kvantna logička vrata i njihovo djelovanje te se izdvaja Cliordova grupa unitarnih transformacija. Ističe se efikasnost korištenja kvantnih logičkih sklopova sastavljenih od vrata van Cliordove grupe na kvantnom raunalu, kao i rezultat o nemogućnosti kloniranja nepoznatog kvantnog stanja, ali moguća teleportacija istog. Koritenjem spomenutih kvantnih logičkih vrata, izvodi se Deutschov algoritam. Pomoću kvantnog Fourierovog transformata, prikazan je Shorov algoritam za faktorizaciju broja N = 21. Na kraju dan je osvrt na trenutni položaj kvantnog računala u odnosu na klasična te se objašnjava BB84 protokol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".