Diz Osteoartritinde Hastalık Aktivitesinin Yaşam Kalitesi ve Uyku Kalitesi İle İlişkisi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ÖZET Amaç: Buçalışmanın amacı diz osteoartritinde hastalık aktivitesinin yaşam kalitesi veuyku kalitesi ile ilişkisini değerlendirmektir. Yöntem: Buçalışma diz osteoartriti olan hastalar üzerinde yapıldı (n = 100; 28 erkek, 72kadın; ort. yaş 58.09 yıl; dağılım 23-85 yıl). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)sınıflandırma sistemi, Görsel Analog Skala (VAS), Western Ontario ve McMasterÜniversiteleri Osteoartrit İndeksi (WOMAC), Dünya Sağlık Örgütü Yaşam Kalitesi(WHOQOL-BREF) ve Pittsburgh Uyku Kalitesi Endeksi (PSQI) sırasıyla radyolojikderecelendirme, ağrı, fiziksel fonksiyon (hastalık aktivitesi), yaşam kalitesive uyku kalitesini değerlendirmek için kullanılmıştır. Bulgular:KL, VAS, WOMAC ve PSQI skorları arasında anlamlı pozitif, WHOQOL-BREF profilleriile KL, VAS, WOMAC ve PSQI skorları arasında anlamlı negatif korelasyon bulundu(tümü p<0.01). Sonuçlar: Sonuçlarımızdiz osteoartritinde daha yüksek hastalık aktivitesinin daha düşük yaşamkalitesi ve daha kötü uyku kalitesi ile ilgili olduğunu göstermektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler:Osteoartrit, diz ağrısı, yaşam kalitesi, uyku kalitesi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".