Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo de investigación responde a diversas inquietudes surgidas a través del desinterés por leer que se observó en los estudiantes del grado 6A del Colegio Fe y Alegría “Madre Alberta” en la ciudad de Santiago de Cali en cuanto a como ser facilitadores en el proceso de construcción de hábitos lectores en estudiantes, docentes y padres de familia los cuales son los actores principales para la promoción de la lectura en el colegio y en el medio en que viven. El equipo investigador se propuso plantear alternativas de solución con una visión clara en miras a ser facilitadores permitiendo una concientización de la promoción de la lectura. En el Colegio Fe y Alegría “Madre Alberta” de la ciudad de Santiago de Cali, se desarrolló con los estudiantes del grado 6ª un aporte con mirar a fomentar en ellos un cambio actitudinal y una incorporación con la lectura; en el que se busca que los estudiantes valoren en su cultura y cotidianidad la importancia de la lectura y sus efectos que causa en su aprendizaje.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".