MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132209669

CityTogo:The Talent Bottleneck during Fast Expansion

2015· other· W7132209669 on OpenAlexaff
S. Li, Liang Dong, Leiping Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2015
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckWork (physics)Context (archaeology)Set (abstract data type)Term (time)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2012年5月,中国家居建材团购网站CityTogo(城市团购网)的创始人、CEO贾光先生在杭州总部办公室里与同事开会,讨论公司团队建设问题。会上,负责业务的同事又提出要大量招聘业务人员的想法,因为“人太少,对客户要求的反应速度就跟不上。” 但是,负责人力资源的同事则摇头否定:“做不到。我们招聘要求高,速度没法快。如果招不到合适的员工,不能代表公司、不能为客户真正创造价值,对业务长期发展更加不利。”… … 会议结束了,但贾光一直在思考这个问题:竞争激烈,扩张速度如果慢于竞争对手就会失去市场份额,CityTogo需要大量人才。人才已经成了快速扩张中的瓶颈。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0140.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207