Bibliographic record
Abstract
四川英杰电气股份有限公司（以下简称“英杰”，股票代码：300820）是面向多个行业的工业电源设计及制造企业。本案例描述了公司创建30年的组织发展历程，特别描述了研发和销售这两个核心业务部门的组织和人才管理挑战。 英杰创办于1993年，最初是四川德阳的一家校办企业，经过多年努力，逐步积累自主研发和技术创新能力，并在工业电源的进口替代方面建立了自己的品牌效应，产品多为技术复杂度较高的定制化产品。 截至2023年6月，英杰已经拥有12个技术平台，7个分、子公司，业务面向40多个行业，并且已向充电桩、储能、专用于LED外延片生产设备的编程直流电源等领域拓展。随着业务的拓展，英杰面临着组织变革和随之而来的人才管理挑战，集中体现在缺乏技术研发和销售方面的人才，以及能够洞察市场、带兵打仗的将才。如何解决这一系列人才难题呢？创始人王军及其管理团队在苦苦寻觅解决之道。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.076 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".