Bibliographic record
Abstract
本案例由案例正文和补充材料两个部分构成，聚焦工作动机对个体行为和工作设计的影响这一问题。其中案例正文讲述了38岁的台湾房产中介公司A公司资深员工罗以伦从总部调任杭州分公司的过程，并对调任前后公司及市场的情况、主人公的所思所想进行了详细地叙述，展现了个人职业发展、薪酬、家庭、价值观等因素对行为的影响。补充材料则提供了两种截然不同的故事背景，借以说明重要他人的不同态度对华人动机模式的影响。本案例故事精炼，同时包罗了影响行为的主要因素，并展现了动机动态变化的过程，能够帮助学生较为深刻地理解自我决定理论，并为工作设计等管理实务提供借鉴。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.096 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".