Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Old Bohemian Annals (OBA) are usually presented as an example of a text succumbing gradually to a change of genre form (from annals to a chronicle) and a fictionalisation of the text associated with that. At the same time, the process, when elements belonging to fiction are embedded in a text with a predominantly other function that of entertainment and aesthetics (i.e. to nonfiction), is labelled as fictionalisation. With the OBA, the change of genre is besides others caused by the transformation of the function of the text, when an entertainment function was added to the original informative, didactic and possibly also agitating functions. As an example of fictionalisation of the text, the texts, which belong to the so-called second, i.e. later redaction of the OBA, are usually presented, but we find elements of fictionalisation also in texts maintaining the earliest layer of the Old Annals. What is interesting from this perspective is one of the texts of the first redaction of the East Bohemian genetic branch, text B, which is written down in the so-called Pinvička Anthology from the last quarter of the 15th century (manuscript of Library of the National Museum in Prague, sign. II F 8).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".