The herbicidal potential of Canadian goldenrod (Solidago canadensis L.) on Theophrastus's nightshade (Abutilo theoprasti Medik)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cilj rada bio je utvrditi herbicidni potencijal vodenih ekstrakata kanadske zlatošipke (Solidago canadensis L.) na klijavost sjemena i rast klijanaca korovne vrste Teofrastov mračnjak (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.). Vodeni ekstrakti lista i cvijeta kanadske zlatošipke (S. canadensis) u različitim koncentracijama (1 %, 2,5 % i 5 %) istraženi su u laboratorijskom pokusu u Petrijevim zdjelicama. Rezultati istraživanja pokazali su da se herbicidni potencijal povećavao s porastom koncentracije vodenih ekstrakata. Vodeni ekstrakti nisu značajno smanjili klijavost sjemena, niti suhu masu klijanaca, izuzev vodenog ekstrakta cvijeta u najvišoj koncentraciji. Duljina korijena klijanaca inhibirana je u svim tretmanima, a pri najvišim koncentracijama i za više od 80 % u odnosu na kontrolu. Duljina izdanka i svježa masa klijanaca statistički su značajno snižene, posebice pri višim koncentracijama vodenih ekstrakata lista i cvijeta. U prosjeku je najveći inhibitorni potencijal zabilježen na duljinu korijena klijanaca. Iako su ekstrakti lista i cvijeta u prosjeku imali podjednak utjecaj, ekstrakti lista pokazali su veće negativno djelovanje na duljinu izdanka i svježu masu klijanaca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".