MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132311749

Educational Charity by Country Garden and Guoqiang Foundation

2022· other· W7132311749 on OpenAlexaff
李秀娟, 鞠慧蓉

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2022
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoundation (evidence)Government (linguistics)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本案例主要介绍了碧桂园集团(简称“碧桂园”)以及创始人杨国强家族在教育慈善方面的实践与探索,通过公益事业践行“希望社会因我们的存在而变得更加美好”的信念。2002年,杨国强一次性捐赠2.65亿元用于创办国华纪念中学,这也是全国第一所纯慈善、全免费的中学。2012年,在了解到慈善性质高等教育的缺失后,杨国强推动建立了碧桂园职业学院,利用碧桂园的产业资源,致力于“产教融合”的培养模式。2013年,国强公益基金会成立,旨在以更专业的方式运营慈善项目,有效推进公益扶贫事业,并立下了“让国强公益基金会即使离开碧桂园也能得到长期的发展”这一独立性目标。 涉猎教育慈善至今,碧桂园与国强公益基金会已硕果累累,帮助了数万名贫困学子通过教育改变命运,并为社会及碧桂园源源不断地输送人才。然而教育慈善的项目也在运营中面临诸多挑战,如国华纪念中学就面临着招生生源受限和日益增长的经费压力等问题。因此,如何对国华纪念中学的长远发展进行规划就成为一项重要议题,其中一个重要的问题则是如何平衡其经济和社会效益,即是否应该保持杨国强创立的慈善初心,还是为了增强其经济效益,以适应国强公益基金的经济独立性目标?同时,碧桂园的教育事业板块博实乐集团以及碧桂园职业学院也提供了参照或对比目标,供国华纪念中学参考发展模式。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1000.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207