MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132352845

Analysis of Theoretical Approaches to the Development of Industrial Sectors Based on Public-private Partnerships

2025· other· en· W7132352845 on OpenAlexaff
X. (Xasan) Sabirov, Х. (Хасан) Сабиров

Bibliographic record

VenueNeliti · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)
FundersUniversity of Cambridge
KeywordsPrivate sectorPublic sectorSecondary sector of the economyEconomic sectorPublic–private partnershipIndustrial policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the theoretical foundations of the development of industrial sectors based on public-private partnerships (PPPs). PPP projects are aimed at improving infrastructure and services by combining public and private sector resources. The role of PPPs in stimulating innovation in the industrial sector and ensuring economic growth is outlined. The theoretical foundations of the development of industrial sectors based on public-private partnerships and the approaches of economists are also reviewed. At the same time, PPP models that reflect their impact on industry are also highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.285
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.007 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNelitiFrench-language works237,207