MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132358829

Understanding nature based solutions (NBS) on buildings to mitigate urban heat islanding (UHI)

2022· article· en· W7132358829 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Zahra Jandaghian, A.R. Hayes, Abhishek Gaur, Henry Lu, Abdelaziz Laouadi, Michael Lacasse

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban heat islandBuilding envelopeUrban agglomerationUrban planningBuilding modelUrban regeneration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Buildings contribute to the urban heat island (UHI) phenomenon, but also have vast “un-used” surfaces that can be employed to incorporate innovative nature-based solutions (NBS) to mitigate UHI effects. NBS on buildings can be achieved by increasing surface reflectivity (ISR) on flat building envelop and increasing surface greenery/vegetation (ISG) on both vertical and horizontal building envelope components. This paper presents a snapshot of the current understanding of NBS and how they affect building performance, the simulations conducted to evaluate NBS and UHI effects and modeling approaches used, the primary knowledge gaps as well as the future steps needed to reduce the effects of UHI in urban agglomerations across Canada. The road map consists of; I) providing approaches to lessen the UHI influences with respect to the implications of warming/changing climate, urban canopy/landscape characteristics and building design; II) development of the best management practices (BMP) for NBS – UHI for Canadian communities; and III) guideline for the design of NBS–UHI solutions to mitigate UHI in accordance with Canadian design climatic load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207