MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132370904

Educating reflective practitioners in the EHEA. The case of Educational Theory in Spanish universities

2012· article· es· W7132370904 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bianca Thoilliez Ruano, María Poveda Sanz

Bibliographic record

Venuee_Buah · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de DeustoUniversidad de ExtremaduraUniversidad de SalamancaUniversidad Camilo José CelaUniversidad de AlmeríaUniversidad de CádizUniversidad de CórdobaUniversidad Pública de NavarraUniversidad de ValladolidUniversitat Rovira i VirgiliUniversidad de JaénUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaUniversidad de ZaragozaUniversidad de NavarraUniversidad de GranadaUniversidad de AlcaláUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosUniversidade da CoruñaUniversidad de Castilla-La ManchaUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversidad Francisco de VitoriaUniversidad de HuelvaUniversidad de MálagaUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaUniversidad Europea de MadridUniversity of VictoriaUniversidad Autónoma de MadridUniversidad de MurciaUniversidad de BurgosUniversidad de SevillaUniversidad Internacional de La RiojaUniversidad de OviedoUniversidad de La Laguna
KeywordsReflection (computer programming)Field (mathematics)CurriculumHigher educationEducation theoryContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Realizado dentro del marco del proyecto I+D+I «Origen y desarrollo del conocimiento teórico de la educación en España» (EDU2010-17367). IP: Teresa Rabazas Romero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.011
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee_BuahSame topicHigher Education Teaching and EvaluationFrench-language works237,207