MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132380022

Canadian MASS - gaps and opportunities

2025· report· en· W7132380022 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Gary J. Dinn, Anthony Goode, Brian McShane

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2025
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaTransport CanadaInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsAutomationPosition (finance)Key (lock)Critical mass (sociodynamics)Benchmark (surveying)Emerging technologies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) are poised to transform shipping through advanced automation and remote operation. This report provides a strategic overview of the emerging MASS ecosystem and Canada’s position within it. The report’s purpose is to identify Canada’s capabilities and gaps in this domain, benchmark against international developments, and outline implications for policy and industry. Key findings indicate that MASS technologies have moved from concept to reality, driven by breakthroughs in digitalization, artificial intelligence (AI), and sensing that now enable vessels to operate with minimal human intervention. These innovations promise safer, more efficient and sustainable maritime operations by reducing human error, optimizing navigation, and lowering emissions. Globally, major economies and companies are investing heavily in MASS development, indicating a fast-growing sector as automation is adopted in commercial and naval fleets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→