MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132408631

Idle Fish: The Evolution of Alibaba's Used Goods Platform

2021· other· W7132408631 on OpenAlexaff
王丹

Bibliographic record

VenueCEIBS Institutional Repository · 2021
Typeother
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCentre Casa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdleWork (physics)Product (mathematics)Production (economics)Key (lock)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

案例主要讨论二手电商平台闲鱼的发展。闲鱼成立于2014年,是阿里巴巴旗下子公司。案例描述了闲鱼三个阶段的发展情况:闲鱼创立起步时制定与众不同的“闲置交易社区”的战略,发展期深耕社区,建立对用户和产品同时驱动的商业模式,通过一系列商业行动,2017年闲鱼的市场渗透率接近80%,从二手闲置行业的后进者变为领先者。之后面对转转的竞争,闲鱼转型平台,在轻运营模式下大力拓展品类和边界保持了竞争优势。然而,在二手闲置行业增速放缓、竞争日益激烈、平台诚信被质疑等不利因素之下,闲鱼面临不少挑战。闲鱼负责人下一步应该怎么做,才能保持领先地位呢?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCEIBS Institutional RepositoryFrench-language works237,207