MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132421983

Imaging ultrafast dissociation dynamics: roaming in formaldehyde

2022· other· en· W7132421983 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
T. Endo, S. P. Neville, P. Lassonde, C. Qu, H. Fujise, M. Fushitani, A. Hishikawa, P. L. Houston, J. M. Bowman, M. S. Schuurman, F. Légaré, H. (Hasbi) Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoamingDissociation (chemistry)MoleculeCoulomb explosionCollision-induced dissociationPhotodissociationEnergy landscape
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a photoexcited molecule breaks apart, we can see fragments following the direct dissociation path, as well as fragments deviating from this minimum energy path. So-called roaming fragments explore the potential energy landscape in a statistical manner and are directly captured using Coulomb explosion imaging (CEI). Individual pathways are distinguished based on state-of-the-art theory analysis. How to image statistical dynamics of individual reaction pathways hidden in an overwhelming background? We made use of the capability of CEI to detect the ion-breakup of single-molecules in real time. We investigated the uni-molecular dissociation reactions in the deuterated formaldehyde molecule (D₂CO). In addition to the conventional dissociation channels – molecular and radical dissociation – a third channel termed roaming has been discovered in 2004, which bypasses the transition state. Identified through spectroscopic footprints using high-resolution spectroscopy and found in a variety of molecules, roaming fragments had however never been observed directly and in a time-resolved way. We succeeded in doing so by using the highly sensitive CEI method in combination with high-level first-principles simulations of all critical experimental steps. Distinctive roaming signatures were identified in the experimental data (see Fig. 1). These were rendered observable by extracting rare stochastic events out of an overwhelming background. Additionally, this first identification of transient roaming features allowed to generalize the definition of roaming. While it was previously assumed that roaming results in molecular dissociation only, we observed that roaming might also be followed by radical dissociation. We further investigated how the overall dissociation depends on the employed UV pump wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→French-language works237,207→