Record W7132439927

CERRAHİ AĞRI DENEYİMİ OLMAYAN HASTALARIN AMELİYAT SONRASI AĞRI İNANÇLARI

2019· dissertation· tr· W7132439927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAYBU AVESIS · 2019

Typedissertation

Languagetr

FieldMedicine

TopicForeign Body Medical Cases

Canadian institutionsnot available

Fundersnot available

KeywordsBlood pressureStatistical analysisHemodynamicsDisease

DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="page" title="Page 9"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"> Bu çalışma farklı cerrahi kliniklerde ameliyat amacı ile yatışı yapılan hastaların, ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası ağrı inançlarını belirlemek amacı ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri, 11 Şubat- 31 Mart 2019 tarihleri arasında Ankara Şehir Hastanesi’nin, Genel Cerrahi, Kalp Damar Cerrahisi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji ve Üroloji Kliniklerinde 377 hastadan toplanmıştır. Verilerin toplanmasında, Veri Toplama Formu, Vizüel Analog Skalası, Ağrı İnançları Ölçeği ve Mcgill Ağrı Ölçeği Kısa Formu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde, SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 24) paket programı kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan hastaların ameliyat sonrası organik inançlar alt boyut puanları, ameliyat öncesi puanlara göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek saptanmıştır (Z=-5.877; p=0.000). Hastaların ameliyattan önce, ağrının fizyolojik, fizyopatolojik ve psikolojik nedenlere bağlı olarak ortaya çıktığı düşüncelerinin, ameliyattan sonra da değişmediği ve bu düşüncenin güçlendiği tespit edilmiştir. Hastaların ameliyat sonrası Visüel Analog Skala puanı (5,63±2,96) ameliyat öncesi Visüel Analog Skala puanına (4,52±3,13) göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde (p=0,000) yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Ortopedi kliniğinde yatan hastaların ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası Visüel Analog Skala puanları, diğer kliniklerde yatan hastalara göre yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır. McGill Ağrı Ölçeği Kısa Formuna göre hastaların %48.8’inin şiddetli ağrısı olduğu ve bu ağrının da çoğunlukla (%28.3) zonklama tipinde olduğu beli

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001

metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002

Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated

Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)

DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none

Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none

GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical

Teacher disagreement score0.347

Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

Category	Codex	Gemma
Metaresearch	0.001	0.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)	0.002	0.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)	0.003	0.001
Bibliometrics	0.001	0.001
Science and technology studies	0.001	0.001
Scholarly communication	0.000	0.001
Open science	0.001	0.000
Research integrity	0.003	0.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)	0.013	0.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019

GPT teacher head0.290

Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work

Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0

Published2019

Admission routes1

Has abstractyes

Download record (JSON)Report an issue with this record

Explore more

Same venueAYBU AVESIS→Same topicForeign Body Medical Cases→French-language works237,207→